CopilotForgeDraft

Catalogue › Copilot Adoption › audience-segmentation

Audience segmentation

Builds the adoption audience model for a Copilot programme by grouping the workforce on work pattern, Copilot access, device and shift constraints, information sensitivity and change impact, using aggregate HR and IT data, then sizing each audience and setting how it is reached, onboarded and supported. Use when one message is going to everyone, when waves need defining, or before personas and scenarios are chosen.

Department
Copilot Adoption
Lifecycle
Discover, Envision, Mobilise
Maturity
explorer, adopter, scaler, ai-enterprise
Risk tiers
0, 1
Platforms
copilot-chat, m365-copilot, copilot-cowork
Editions
starter, scale, enterprise
Reviewers
none
Status
draft
Copilot Cowork
Copilot Adoption plugin for Copilot Cowork, or this skill on its own: Download SKILL.md
Licence
CC BY 4.0, by Simon Foote

Purpose

Adoption programmes that treat the workforce as one audience end up designing for the people nearest the programme team: office-based, digitally confident and already curious. This skill builds an audience model that groups people by how they work, what they can access, what constrains them and how much the change affects them, so waves, messages, onboarding and support can be tailored to each group. It works from aggregate, declared organisational data, never from individual behaviour or personal characteristics. It usually goes wrong when segments are copied from the org chart, when frontline and part-time groups are added as an afterthought, or when personas become stereotypes nobody in the business recognises.

When to use

When not to use

Questions to ask first

  1. What workforce data may the programme use (role families, locations, work patterns, contract types), who owns it, and what have HR and the data protection lead agreed it can be used for?
  2. Which Copilot experiences will each group actually have, on which devices, as confirmed by IT rather than assumed?
  3. Where do groups differ in ways that change how they must be reached - shifts, shared devices, languages, regulated duties, accessibility needs?
  4. Which groups face the greatest change impact or concern, and which already have a sponsor asking for help?
  5. What minimum group size applies when audiences are targeted or reported?

Required inputs

Where HR data is not available, draft a first model from business-unit leaders' descriptions and mark every size as "to confirm". Never infer access or licence entitlement from job title; record what IT confirms and leave the rest open.

Decision framework

Segment only on dimensions that change what the programme does. A dimension that changes no treatment is noise.

DimensionTypical valuesWhat it changes
Work patternDesk, hybrid, field, frontline or shift-basedFormat, length and timing of onboarding and support
Copilot accessCopilot Chat only, Microsoft 365 Copilot, agents in scope, no access yetWhich scenarios and guidance apply
Device and connectivityPersonal laptop, shared device, mobile onlyHow people reach learning and help
Information sensitivityRoutine, confidential, regulated or personal-data heavyEmphasis of approved-use guidance and wave timing
Change impactLow, medium, highDepth of change support and manager involvement
Readiness signalsSponsor in place, Champions present, permissions reviewedWhether the group can go early

Combine dimensions into a small number of audiences, usually four to eight for one organisation. Then test the model.

TestPasses when
DistinctEach audience receives at least one treatment the others do not; otherwise merge
RecognisableBusiness leaders can name the teams that belong to it
SizedHeadcount is known, or marked to confirm with an owner
ReachableThere is a channel and a manager route that reaches it
Safe to reportIt is above the minimum group size, or is combined with another for reporting

Practitioner approach

Start with treatments, not data. Ask the adoption lead what the programme can actually vary between groups: message, channel, onboarding format, session length, timing, support route, starting scenarios and wave. Those are the levers, and the segmentation needs only the dimensions that pull them. Teams that start from an HR extract tend to produce dozens of segments that nobody can act on.

Draft the first model with business-unit leaders and IT in the same conversation. Leaders know how work really happens, and IT knows who has which access on which device. Walk through each part of the organisation and ask how these people work, where they are when they could learn, and what would stop them using Copilot tomorrow. Write the answers in the business's own words, then confirm sizes from HR's aggregate data rather than from memory.

Give frontline, shift-based, part-time and field audiences the same attention as office staff from the first draft. They are the groups most often missed, and often the ones where a few well-chosen scenarios matter most. Flag audiences that handle highly sensitive or regulated information, because approved-use guidance and permissions hygiene matter most there and their wave may depend on remediation work.

Describe each audience as a short profile: who is in it (role families and locations, never named people), how they work, what access and devices they have, the concerns likely to surface, the expected change impact, the channels and manager routes that reach them, and what the programme will do differently for them. Where a persona helps people imagine the audience, write it as a fictional composite and label it as such. Never build a persona from a real colleague, and never segment on age, gender, health or other personal characteristics.

Test the model with the people who will use it. The launch planner should be able to sequence waves from it, scenario discovery should be able to pick personas from it, the communications lead should be able to plan channels from it, and the support lead should be able to see where demand will come from. If any of them cannot, the model is either too coarse or too fine.

Keep it current. Reorganisations, new access decisions and acquisitions all change audiences. Give the model an owner, a review point before each wave and a simple rule for where new joiners fall. Reporting by audience applies the minimum group size; small audiences can be treated separately for onboarding but combined for reporting.

Outputs

Microsoft platform considerations

Audiences often differ most in which Copilot experience they have: Copilot Chat, Copilot in the Microsoft 365 apps, Copilot Cowork or agents, and on desktop, web or mobile. Record the access IT confirms for each audience and do not infer it from role. Availability, naming and licensing change often; check references/sources.md, and send licensing questions to the Microsoft licensing guide or a licensing partner.

Adoption considerations

This skill is the foundation that other adoption work tailors from. Its most important contribution is making visible the audiences a default plan would miss, so their needs shape the launch rather than being patched in afterwards.

Knowledge considerations

Not applicable as a primary concern, because segmentation describes people and work patterns rather than grounding content. Note where an audience relies heavily on particular policies or procedures, so knowledge readiness can be prioritised for the waves that need it.

Security and privacy considerations

Use aggregate HR data only, for the purpose agreed with HR and the data protection lead. Do not hold individual-level lists in the audience model, and apply the minimum group size wherever audiences are reported. Flag audiences whose work is sensitive so the approved-use guidance and permissions position can be checked before their wave. Data protection questions end with the organisation's DPO.

Responsible AI considerations

Segmentation decides who is offered what, so check it for unfair exclusion: part-time staff, frontline workers, people using assistive technology and those working in another language should not be left without a route. Personas must not stereotype. Where an audience is deferred, record why and when it will be revisited.

Evaluation requirements

Not applicable as solution evaluation, because this skill designs an audience model rather than an AI solution. The model is tested by whether the launch, scenario, communications and support owners can each act on it.

Value measures

Owned by the adoption lead, with a baseline at the first wave: the share of the workforce covered by a defined audience with a treatment, reach of onboarding by audience, and adoption indicators by audience from copilot-adoption:adoption-measurement. Reported at audience level above the minimum group size, never by individual.

Scale notes

Starter

Three to five audiences drawn up in one workshop with business leaders and IT, sized from headcount by team and kept on one page.

Scale

Five to eight audiences with profiles and a treatment matrix, refreshed before each wave and shared with communications, learning and support.

Enterprise

A shared audience model across regions or divisions, with local variants for language and regulation, a named owner, and alignment with HR's workforce taxonomy so reporting is consistent.

Hand-offs

Reviewer gates

Not applicable as a formal gate, because segmentation does not release an AI solution; use of workforce data follows the organisation's existing data protection controls and the DPO's advice.

Failure modes

Sources

references/sources.md in this skill lists the source records behind this skill, what each is authoritative for, how volatile it is and what you may do with it. Product availability, licensing, limits and preview status change often, so check the current source before stating them, and cite what you used.

Never

Source records for this skill

Microsoft Copilot adoption resources

Microsoft 365 Copilot overview

Credit

This skill was created by Simon Foote as part of CopilotForge, licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Credit the author when you share or adapt it.